Cheryl works where organisations and systems begin: education.
With over three decades of work across education, policy, media, and business, Cheryl’s international work has taught her one thing above all: how much still needs to be done. Especially given how education decisions impact entire communities and economies and how fragmented approaches often miss the real challenges organisations and sectors face.
Cheryl’s deliberate horizontal career path, spanning system transformation, venture launches, and advising education leaders, has given her deep appreciation for the unique problems and emerging challenges organisations encounter.
When education and services are misaligned, the effects ripple through workforce development, infrastructure delivery, civic participation, and public trust.
Cheryl works with organisations and systems to understand their specific context and challenges. There are no pre-packaged solutions looking for a problem to solve. Instead, she focuses on objective discovery, learning what’s actually happening, what’s needed and what’s possible.
The work is both challenging and energising. Within every complex organisational challenge lie opportunities for meaningful change.
The most important conversations often begin with: “What if we tried something different?”
Cheryl, Mike and Peter – a startling discussion about the Commonwealth of Australia and its Constitution.
For Press Release:
“This Video Changes Everything” – A Constitutional Earthquake or Long-Overdue Reckoning?
Visit our page and watch the first video on Cheryl Lacey Show page:
https://mikeholtshow.com/videos-cheryl-lacey/
Host Cheryl Lacey brings together commentator Mike Holt and activist Peter for a sweeping and explosive conversation about Australia’s constitutional foundations, national sovereignty, and the legitimacy of modern government. The result is a provocative, fast-moving discussion that will leave many viewers questioning what they thought they knew about the Commonwealth.
From the outset, Lacey frames the issue starkly: Australians aren’t just being “dumbed down” — they are being misled, mistreated, and governed by a system that, according to her guests, has drifted far from lawful authority. What follows is a detailed attempt to explain how that happened, why it matters, and what the presenters believe must come next.
A Government Without Accountability?
The central claim running through the video is that Australia’s Constitution — the document meant to define and limit government power — was altered in a way that removed the most important safeguard of all: accountability.
Peter recounts his research into the original 1898 draft Constitution, which included the clause “This Act shall bind the Crown.” According to him, this wording ensured that government, the executive, and all its arms were subject to the law and could not operate with immunity. But when the final Constitution was enacted in 1900, he says, that binding clause was removed — leaving only a reference to the Queen and her heirs.
To Peter and Holt, this was no clerical oversight. They argue it was a deliberate shift that allowed governments to act without constraint, paving the way for decades of overreach, unaccountable policing, and the erosion of citizens’ rights.
A Nation Never Properly Constituted?
The conversation goes further, suggesting that because Australians voted on the earlier draft — not the altered version — the country has never truly been constituted according to the will of the people. Lacey presses the point: if Edmund Barton walked into office with the wrong Constitution, what does that mean for every government since?
The presenters’ answer is blunt: Australia has been operating under an invalid constitutional framework for more than a century.
International Treaties and a “Foreign Occupation”
The video then widens its scope. Holt and Peter argue that Australia became a sovereign nation after signing the Treaty of Versailles in 1919, and that the League of Nations — and later the United Nations — prohibited member states from imposing foreign laws on one another. Because the Constitution is an Act of the British Parliament, they claim it should have ceased to apply once Australia gained international recognition as an independent state.
This, they say, means Australia has been living under a form of foreign political and legal control ever since — a “military dictatorship disguised as a democracy,” in Peter’s words.
The ICC Plan
The second half of the video focuses on what the presenters intend to do about it. Peter has drafted a complaint to the International Criminal Court (ICC) and the International Court of Justice (ICJ), accusing the Australian government and its agents of crimes including:
- crimes against humanity
- war crimes
- genocide
- crimes of aggression
Their goal is to obtain an international ruling declaring the Australian government illegitimate, forcing a national reset and the creation of a new constitution “by the people, for the people.”
Holt reveals a forthcoming website where Australians will be invited to endorse the filing. They hope to gather hundreds of thousands — even millions — of signatures to demonstrate public support.
A Call to Action
Despite the heavy subject matter, the tone of the video is a rallying cry. The presenters insist that Australia is rich, resource-laden, and capable of becoming “the most prosperous nation in the world” — but only if citizens reclaim control from what they describe as a corrupt and unaccountable political class.
The message is clear: change will not come from within the system. It must come from ordinary Australians who choose to stand up.
Final Thoughts
Whether viewers accept the presenters’ conclusions or not, “This Video Changes Everything” is certain to spark debate. It blends historical interpretation, constitutional argument, and political activism into a narrative that challenges the legitimacy of Australia’s governing structures from the ground up.
For supporters of constitutional reform, it will feel like long-overdue truth-telling. For others, it will raise serious questions about evidence, interpretation, and the limits of international law. But one thing is certain: this is a conversation that will not quietly fade away.
NOTE: Visit our Home page and scroll down to hear all our podcasts together.